When select customers had problems with their cash flow, J. Lorber saw an opportunity to help them find alternative financing options. Some customers needed additional credit and longer terms. However, extending terms past 60 days was not ideal. “After 60 days, it becomes challenging because we have to pay our vendors. Because of this, we prefer not to extend the terms.” Michael Lorber explains. Not to mention, offering credit in-house came with a slew of drawbacks, such as:
Loss of sales. Over the years, they turned down sales due to high credit risk, with “tremendous opportunity lost.” “We’d say, ‘We want this sale, but at what risk? If we’re not getting paid, it doesn’t matter how much the sale is.” Lorber says. When a customer hits their credit limit, it would also put the account manager in a bind, unable to sell them more materials.
Unpleasant customer experiences. Getting the customer set up with credit, with credit insurance, public bonds and trade references, could be a long, drawn-out process. This sometimes created an unpleasant experience for J Lorber’s customers. Not to mention the awkward conversation if they weren’t able to extend terms after all.
Chasing down payments. When J. Lorber would extend payment terms, some contractors would pay, and some wouldn’t. There was always the possibility of having to chase down payments, a less-than-ideal scenario that does nothing to help customer relationships